Human Rights & Public Liberties

Human Rights & Public Liberties

Newsletter
13 Jan, 2021

A Detention Centre That Should Not Exist

24 May, 2026
Protest at the Dilley immigration detention center | Reuters Connect

Protest at the Dilley immigration detention center | Reuters Connect

The last migrant family detention facility in the United States stands accused of systemic cruelty. The case for closing it is overwhelming.

In Dilley, a small town in south Texas, sits the South Texas Family Residential Center, the only remaining migrant family detention facility in the United States. Known simply as Dilley, the centre has become a symbol of what critics describe as the cruelty embedded in America’s immigration detention system. Amnesty International is calling for its immediate closure and for a permanent end to the detention of migrant children and families on American soil.

The accounts emerging from inside are grim. Families report prolonged incarceration without due process, denial of adequate medical care and insufficient access to clean drinking water. Infants and young children have experienced alarming weight loss. Families are frequently separated while in custody. Children are denied basic opportunities for play. Taken together, the picture is not of administrative imperfection but of a facility whose conditions cause measurable harm to some of the most vulnerable people in the immigration system.

Children as a policy instrument

The detention of children in immigration facilities has long been contested in American law and in international human rights standards. Holding minors, particularly alongside or separated from their parents, in conditions that deprive them of adequate nutrition, healthcare and the ordinary experience of childhood is difficult to square with any recognised framework of child welfare. That the United States, which presents itself as a defender of human rights abroad, continues to operate such a facility makes the contradiction sharper still.

Dilley has the capacity to hold large numbers of families and has cycled through periods of expansion and contraction depending on the political priorities of successive administrations. Its persistence reflects a broader political choice to treat detention as a cornerstone of immigration enforcement, regardless of the human cost to those inside.

The demand is simple: shut it down, and do not replace it.

Sources: Amnesty International; South Texas Family Residential Center detainee accounts; US immigration detention records.