Saturday, February 07th,

Al Jazeera Forum highlighted the dual nature of human rights and international law, as both a necessary framework and a system fraught with limitations, particularly in the context of the Gaza crisis. Participants underscored the pressing need for reform in international justice mechanisms, prompting a reevaluation of the interplay between law and power in today’s global landscape.

Central to the discussions was the concept of universal jurisdiction. Could its expansion offer a viable path to hold international criminals accountable, or would it remain a politically fragile instrument? The consensus leaned towards the necessity of fortifying jurisdictional mechanisms to shield them from political manipulation and legislative regression.

Attention turned to the efficacy of international court rulings, notably those from the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, in a world lacking strong enforcement capabilities. The debate explored whether these tribunals could still bolster international legal norms and if their decisions might serve as potent tools against impunity.

The role of the ICC prosecutor was scrutinized, with discussions on maintaining effectiveness amid tepid political support and intentional constraints by certain states. Observers cautioned that without consistent enforcement and political backing, international criminal justice risks being perceived as selectively applied.

A philosophical reflection emerged: the enduring relevance of international law, even when it is flouted or sidelined. Recent events, such as the Gaza conflict, U.S. actions in Venezuela, and Europe’s muted responses, were cited as evidence that international law remains a vital normative framework, offering diplomatic leverage and a basis for accountability, while also highlighting areas in need of reform.

The first day of the forum concluded by addressing the challenges facing international humanitarian law in current conflict scenarios, with Gaza as a case in point. Panelists emphasized the complexities of applying legal protections amid asymmetric warfare, civilian casualties, occupation, and restricted humanitarian access. They called for enhanced legal clarity, robust enforcement, and international collaboration to better safeguard civilians and curb impunity in modern conflicts.